Categories
Uncategorized

"Top Ten Sources" Announces its Executive Team

Now it can be told: my wife, Wendy Koslow, is the Editor-in-Chief of Top 10 Sources. Congrats, Wendy!

Also on the management team are Halley “Halley’s Comment” Suitt as CEO and Indigo Tabor as Technical Editor-in-Chief.


What is Top 10 Sources?

Let’s let the site do the talking:

Top 10 Sources is a directory of sites that bring you the freshest,

most relevant content on the Web. We know it’s impossible for anyone to

keep track of the 20 million+ online sources of information. So our

editors search Web 2.0 — blogs, podcasts, wikis, news sites, and every

kind of syndicated sources online — by hand. Our Top 10 lists are

updated frequently as great new sources come online.

Top 10 Sources covers a wide array of topics, assigning an editor to each topic. A topic’s editor will search for what he or she feels are the ten best syndicated sources — that is, sources of information with an RSS feed, such as blogs, new websites and so on — and includes them on the page for that topic. You can visit that topic’s page to keep up with the entries from those ten sources. For the hardcore information junkie, each Top 10 Sources topic has an OPML feed, which makes it easy to add any set of top ten feeds to your aggregator.

If what I just wrote didn’t make any sense, try visiting a Top 10 Sources page to get a feel for what it’s about. Here are some topics you might want to try:

There are all sorts of topics covered in Top 10 Sources, and more are being added all the time — I’ll probably end up contributing to a couple myself. If you’re looking for new sources of information or new blogs to read, Top 10 Sources is a good launching point. Check it out!

Categories
In the News

It’s Election Day in Canada — Go Vote!

Today, Monday January 23rd, 2006, is Election Day in Canada. If you’re eligible to vote, vote!


I was looking for some kind of “vote” image with which to embellish this entry. I used a Google image search for the word “vote” and found this comic on the second page of results. It was so silly that I had to use it:

(In case you were wondering, this seems to be one of a collection of comics at a site called  Holistic Forge Works, drawn using the MS Paint program and a mouse.)

Categories
In the News

Election Tidbits

Sam “Hollywood’s MP” Bulte’s greatest

contribution to the copyfight may be the phrase she coined at the January 11th all-candidates meeting in a

heat-of-the-moment outburst in response to being asked to take Michael Geist’s Copyright Pledge: “Pro-User Zealot”.

(Come to think of it, my greatest contribution may be having the presence of mind to capture the outburst on video and disseminate it. I can live with that.)

Should you want Ms. Bulte’s soon-to-be immortal words are in bumper-sticker form, wait no more — this CafePress site is selling them!


They’re not yet purchasing zambonis in Hell, but they’re donning

windbreakers: One of Accordion City’s alt-weeklies, eye, is saying what I said after the last electionthe best possible outcome might be a Conservative minority:

Our

fondest hope is that the Conservative momentum falls short of a

majority. A Harper minority may actually be the best possible result of

this election: with no right-wing allies in Parliament, the

Conservatives would be prevented from instituting the nightmarish

aspects of their agenda. Harper would be forced to work with Layton and

Gilles Duceppe (given that a Conservative coalition with the Liberals

is unthinkable) on more temperate shared goals such as parliamentary

and electoral reform, environmentalism and, perhaps, decentralization.

It’s not ideal, but it’s also not Armageddon.

Dan over at BlogTO is “throwing his weight” for the same result.


Melanie McBride over at Chandrasutra writes about Tom Flanagan, who seems at first blush to be a Wal-Mart version of Karl Rove. Or perhaps he’s a Zellers next to Karl Rove’s Target. I’m sure there’s an apt metaphor somewhere.

She also touches on a very important topic: a lack of understanding

that we out here in the east have about western Canada (and probably

vice versa). What’s not helping is the prevailing attitude on either

side, each happy to maintain the worst possible viewpoint of the other.


By the bye, I’m not the only Kickass Karaoke regular who’s out there fighting the good fight: I caught Mike D’Abramo (second face on the page, better known to Kickass regulars as “Mike D.” from Youthography (a youth-oriented marketing/communication firm run by fellow Kickass Karaoke regular Max Valiquette) talking on CP24

about their work in trying to get young people out there to vote. As

Mike says, you’re Canadian too, so make sure you have your say!

Categories
Uncategorized

Tomorrow is Not That Day

Yours Truly!

About a month before the last Canadian Federal Election, Enter Stage Right, a site popular with some of my conservative compatriots in the Canadian blogosphere, ran an article titled Victoria Day and the Life and Death of Traditional Canada. It inspired one of my more popular entries in this blog, the “My Canada Includes Accordion Guy” article, which got a lot of enthusiastic response in the comments and only one hand-wringing “maybe the problem is YOU!” semi-rebuttal from a knee-jerk conservative in another blog’s comments.

The

reason that a lot of us are loath to support the Conservative Party is that

we suspect that they a lot of them don’t like us. It wasn’t that long

ago that it was once the Reform Party.

This was the party of Bob Ringma, who suggested that gays

and “ethnics” could be fired or “moved to the back of the

shop,” if the employer thought that would help business.

We left the Philippines in 1975, not to suckle on the Canadian welfare teat, but because President Ferdinand Marcos

declared martial law and the democratic system was replaced by a

military dictatorship. We left for the same reasons many longer-time

Canadians’ ancestors did: to seek out a better life.

We came

here with skills: Dad’s an obstetrician-gynecologist, Mom’s a

cardiologist and both trained both in the Philippines and in the U.S..

My sister and I were educated here, and she ended up following the

family trade and became a doctor of community medicine and works at the

Peel Region Board of Health.

I’m the “black sheep” of the family

— I have only a bachelor’s degree and went into computer programming.

Even so, my work history speaks for itself: I’ve worked for Mackerel

Interactive Multimedia, one of Canada’s highly-regarded interactive multimedia companies, then one of Canada’s most ambitious dot-coms and finally Tucows, one of Canada’s best-known internet companies.

Simply put: if we took benefits from Canada, we paid them back in spades.

A

favourite bogeyman of Conservative supporters is that immigrants are

often the thin edge of the wedge, sponsoring the rest of the clan for

immigration as soon as they get their citizenship papers. In 31 years

here, the only one in my family who’s ever sponsored someone to

immigrate here is me. I’m sponsoring my wife, who last worked at

Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

We

understand that a wide-open-door policy would be disastrous, but at the

same time, we don’t subscribe to the belief that many Conservative

supporters seem to — that all people who don’t look like descendants

of the Family Compact or Chateau Clique are subhumans out to bleed the country dry.

There’s

lots of common ground shared by immigrants of my ilk and some of

Conservative supporters. Most of us were lucky enough to have parents

who bypassed a lot of North American baby boomer culture and its

extended adolescence, and thus didn’t have to “raise our parents while

raising ourselves” (I suspect that this is the source of a the

wooly-headedness amongst people some of the people who vote for the NDP

by reflex). We come from cultures where hard work is valued, capitalism

isn’t a dirty word and ambition is a virtue. And we do love a Tim Horton’s

double-chocolate donut. It may not be the land of our birth, but it’s

the land we chose to call home, just like your forebears did. Like

them, we hope to leave the place a little better than we found it.

If

the Conservative Party wants my vote, they’ll have to convince me that

they’re not the same as the party from which they grew. They’ll have to

convince me that they’ve moved beyond the “Every since my family came

to Canada, we’ve had nothing but crap from the immigrants” mindset.

I know some Conservative campaigners and supporters who aren’t cut from

the Bob Ringma mold, and with whom I’ve shared a pint of Upper Canada

Dark, so I know that someday, I may be convinced.

Tomorrow is not that day.

Categories
Uncategorized

A 99% Savings!

Rather than spend $250 at the fundraiser for “Hollywood’s MP”, Sam Bulte, my friend Eldon Brown picked up a vinyl copy of The Trinity Session — the album that made the Cowboy Junkies famous — for $2.50, which represents a 99% savings.

Strangely enough, this is the sort of exercise of the right of first sale that the record industry doesn’t like, especially as more and more music goes digital. After all, they wanted to collect royalties on the sale of used CDs.


Speaking of the Cowboy Junkies, while searching for images of them, this one came near the top:

…and I couldn’t help but be reminded of this image:

Categories
Uncategorized

Which Parkdale-High Park Candidates Live in Parkdale High-Park? [Updated]

Lives in the Riding

  • Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party

    Lives in the riding. Hat tip to Steve Stinson for the update.

  • Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party
    Lives in the riding.
  • Rob Rischinsky, Green Party
    Lives in the riding.

  • Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party
    I believe he lives in the riding. Can anyone confirm this one?
  • Terry Parker, Marijuana Party
    I

    believe that his physical body actually lives within the riding of

    Parkdale-High Park. I wouldn’t hazard a guess as to the location of his

    consciousness. Can anyone confirm either one?

Lives Outside the Riding

Categories
In the News

The Economist’s Endorsement

For the 2004 U.S. election, The Economist — one of my favourite magazines — gave a heavy hearted endorsement John Kerry in their editiorial, The Incompetent or the Incoherent?. For the 2006 Canadian elections, they endorse Stephen Harper and the Conservatives in an editorial titled Those Daring Canadians [you can read the article if you’re willing to sit through an advertisement], which is subtitled “And why they should vote Conservative this time”.

Here’s the meat of the article:

On the face of it, the sacking [of the Liberal Party] seems perverse, and ungrateful. The Liberals have given Canada a long period of stable politics,

enlightened social policy and economic growth, boosted lately by the

world’s growing appetite for Canada’s plentiful energy and natural

resources. Although the prime minister, Paul Martin, has had the top

job only since the end of 2003, he gave a stellar performance as

finance minister in the years before that, restoring order to public

finances the Tories had left in chaos. By comparison, his Conservative

challenger, Stephen Harper, is an unknown quantity, untested by

previous high office and until recently written off as a not especially

competent leader of the opposition. In short, barring a last-minute

reversion to type as they enter the polling stations, Canadians seem to

have decided to take a gamble. Gambling will be out of character. It

will also, on this occasion, be right.

The Liberals have done many good things over the past 12 years, but

have lately succumbed to the three familiar vices of a party that has

been too long in power. The first of these is sleaze. Mr Martin would

not be holding this unpopular mid-winter election at all but for the

unearthing of a decade-old financing scandal under which public money

intended to promote the federal cause in Quebec was diverted to the

Liberals and their cronies. The second is fractiousness. Mr Martin

became prime minister only after mounting a palace coup against his

predecessor, Jean Chrétien. Instead of uniting around the new leader,

the party thereupon coalesced around two sullen and unforgiving camps.

The last is directionlessness. However stellar his performance as a

finance minister, Mr Martin has failed as prime minister to convey a

sense of policy priorities to his demoralised civil servants or of

national purpose to Canadians at large.

The West’s Turn
The vices of prolonged incumbency might be enough to persuade voters in

almost any democracy that it was time for a change. But Canada has

another reason on top of this to welcome a Conservative victory. Over

recent years, many people in western Canada, where the Conservatives

are strongest, have come to believe that their part of the country does

not get a fair hearing in Ottawa, where national politics is

traditionally dominated by Ontario and Quebec, and the latter’s

constant talk of secession. Westerners ruefully note that since 1968

Canada has spent 36 years under prime ministers who come from Quebec,

or represent constituencies in Quebec, and a mere 15 months under prime

ministers from the west. As an adopted westerner, Mr Harper might

therefore be in a good position to inject new unity into a federation

under strain.