This morning, I attended a Technology Innovators Breakfast session at the Toronto Board of Trade as a guest of Alicia Bulwik, Project Manager of ICT Toronto. It’s a suit-y affair, held at the Toronto Board of Trade’s dining room, deep in the heart of suitland: First Canadian Place at the corner of Bay and King Streets, the centre of the Canadian financial universe.
This breakfast gathering is one of a new series in which interested parties can “hear Toronto’s industry leaders expound on their own personal success stories – why Toronto is their company’s chosen location to expand their business, and what their forecast is for the next wave of technology.” Today’s speakers were:
By my count, the event was attended by about 100 people, with a good number of IBMers in attendance, and the major banks well-represented. I sat at the ICT Toronto table, joined by a number of the ICT Toronto regulars, including my TorCamp brain trust compatriot Jay Goldman.
I found the event useful — it’s good to break out of the nerd world every now and again and see what the suits — particularly the big players like IBM, Accenture and the major financial institutions — are up to. After all, tech centres thrive when nerds meet rich people. I’d be more than happy to attend another one of these breakfast sessions and learn more.
The following is a transcription of the notes I took during the presentations. If you attended the breakfast and I missed anything in these notes or made a mistake, let me know in the comments!
And before I begin, I’d like to extend my most heartfelt thanks to Alicia Bulwik for inviting us to join the ICT Toronto table at the event. I know that I’ve been critical of ICT Toronto’s early efforts, but I look forward to assisting them reach their goal of making Toronto a world-class centre for high tech.
our technical know-how
only $10 million went to information and communication
technologies firms.
specifically for technology: 0
of the ICT community”
Even Brainhunter’s “B- and C-caliber candidates” are getting
multiple offers.
For them, merely getting a paycheque isn’t enough;
they want interesting, challenging work.
On the hiring side, there’s a high level of specificity
in what companies want: specific skills, experience and
expertise.
an obstacle.
Finding clients used to be a chore for contractors 10
years ago; now it’s a matter of calling up your favourite
recruiters. Companies like BrainHunter also help contractors
with the matter of getting paid — their HireSafe program
managed $30 million in salaries this past month. Contract working
is now a safe, viable option.
“International Business Machines” and the “IBM” acronym.
are in the Toronto area.
Canada’s largest software development facility, with
2,500 people and $350 million in R&D spending.
to transition to become a services company.
proprietary standards, they now want open solutions
built on open standards.
Think of RFID tags, home appliances, shipping containers,
roadways…
Brazil/Russia/India/China — countries)
if it were, we’d see everything in tech being commoditized
and work flowing in one direction only.
different channels, even totally different industries!
doubled in the last year.
coupled with business insight.
right here:
people in the world, and a large portion of
them are here
we have many immigrants with post-secondary
degrees.
students get started
that knowledge and experience don’t get lost when
people retire
ideas and points of view, creativity flourishes.
organization: do they all always have to be
physically located within your office?
it’s possible to simultaneously be partners, competitors,
clients and suppliers.
of them said that the majority of ideas for innovation
came from outside their companies.
and a strong ICT community is key:
do some risk-taking and risk-sharing, and collaborate.
Q [RBC Innovation person] How can the little guys — the 100-man,
200-man shops — “plug and play”, or participate in the ICT sector?
A [Dan Fortin]:
they’re the ones who’ll have more trouble adjusting to a more
collaborative environment, especially if their corporate culture
doesn’t favour collaboration.
to collaborate with.
Q [Power Logic person]: Regarding the earlier statement on how little
angel money is being spent on tech — what can leaders do to change
this situation and increase angel investment? We need that, because
it’s those “skunk works” projects that are the sources of change.
A [Dan Fortin]:
research and development and how to help government understand
the funding requirements for ICT
A [Alizabeth Calder]:
is the “fear factor”: they feel held to ransom by the techies
they invest in.
in a way that business people can understand.
(Commenter: We also need tax incentives to reduce the “fear factor” of
angel investors.)
Q [Person from Ottawa]: How do we get investors past what seems to
be their fixation — that of the “early exit”, where they want to invest in a
technology just to make some quick money and then bail? There seems to be
a low level of interest in actual commercialization, and as a result, the
attention is moving away from technology out of frustration.
A [Dan Fortin]:
through to commercialization is that there are so many stories
about terrific opportunities that eventually don’t pan out.
the $250,000 briefcase, but you held out and walked away with
a $45 one.”
A [Alizabeth Calder]:
had principals that we could look in the eye.
Q [Dave Craig, PricewaterhouseCoopers]: What’s ingredients
is Toronto missing for ICT success?
A [Dan Fortin]:
but I strongly recommend against that. Take the example of
the problem with the Detroit/Windsor corridor, through which
35% of the goods between the US and Canada flow. They did
a 4-year study of the problems, and the end result is
a task force with a 5-year window to make recommendations!
This story was being told by a Canadian Pacific Railway
exec who reminded the audience that once upon a time,
“it took us only 4 years to build a friggin’ railway
across the country!”
take on themselves.
A [Alizabeth Calder]:
without worrying whether or not they’re proprietary.
ICT community to meet each other.
Q [Host]: What do you think of the idea to close the Gardiner?
A [Dan Fortin]:
There’s a good chance you’ve seen this photo by now: Pictured seated from left to…
Here’s a collection of interesting memes, pictures, an cartoons floating around the internet that I…
Tap to see the source. This is yesterday’s daily New Yorker cartoon, created by Brendan…
C’mon, let it not be Asians this time. Last time was pretty bad. Here’s the…
Jon Stewart’s right, and we’ve been here before. Where we are now, I’ve been before…
Poppies thrive in overturned soil, which is why they bloom in battlefields. I’m in the…
View Comments
First of all, thanks, Joey, for an excellent summary of this morning's event! I'm going to link to it from our blog at http://www.bot.com/blog for the benefit of people who missed the breakfast.
I'm glad that you found the event so useful and interesting. We started this series and formed an ICT Advisory Committee to help bring everyone together -- buyers and sellers, innovators and technologists, ICT and corporate leaders, big and small players.
Our hope is to create a home for networking and collaboration for the ICT community across the Toronto region. We've been really pleased with the reaction and the involvement in our Committee.
FYI, just a couple of points about your post: the host you were wondering about is Dave Dobbin, President of Toronto Hydro Telecom and Chair of our ICT Advisory Committee ... interesting that you found it 'suit-y' because we're bringing in a 'no ties required' rule for these events ... and the turn-out was 170 people, including many CIO's.
Anyway, thanks again for a comprehensive posting. Hope to see you at our next Technology Innovators Breakfast on January 31 with Bill Morris of Accenture Canada.
- Grant Humes, Interim President, Toronto Board of Trade
It seems like it was an interesting event. I only have one question, it sounds like there may be something wrong with wearing a suit or with working on King and Bay. Is that the tone you wanted to give to the introduction, and if so, what is wrong with wearing a suit?
It may well be true that “tech centres thrive when nerds meet rich people”, but I doubt that many rich people were at this event. In this context, “rich people” are those who made millions from selling a startup and are now angel investors. Not people who work for IBM and Accenture and the big banks.
The Brainhunter EVP’s comments about the “employee's market” can easily mislead some into thinking that there is a vibrant market for technology innovators. The truth is revealed by your other take-away that “there’s a high level of specificity in what companies want: specific skills, experience and expertise.” Which means “just code up the following specs using the following designated tools.” Brainhunter, like most tech recruiting firms, finds candidates for an opening via a database search for requirements such as “2 or more years of JavaScript”. How else could they deal with the “750,000 job seekers in our database”?
Toronto is not “home to IBM’s Toronto Software Lab, Canada’s largest software development facility”. It’s in Markham. Yes, the “Toronto” Software Lab.
I thought the event was good as well. Great summary you've covered everything they both said yesterday.
BOT has a blog, who would have guessed it...