Maria pointed me to a Globe and Mail article titled Does beta city have what it takes to be an alpha?. The basis for the article is a statement by Greg Clark, lead adviser to the British government on city development and a paid strategy adviser to TEDCO (Toronto Economic Development Corporation).
Here’s a snippet from the article:
Toronto, at the moment, is considered a “beta city” for its globalized business credentials, in the same league as San Francisco and Zurich.
“Can Toronto be an alpha city? Yes it can, in my opinion,” Mr. Clark said after addressing city council’s economic development committee yesterday. But Toronto will have to better co-ordinate all that it does with an aim to competing for business investment with cities around the world, he said.
And to transform Toronto into a major player on the world stage, Mr. Clark said, Mayor David Miller doesn’t necessarily need to win his fight for more money from the provincial and federal governments.
“There is a huge amount of capital that is out there available to invest in many of the things the city wants to invest in,” he said. “And if the city didn’t get a penny more, a cent more, from the provincial and federal governments, which obviously I hope it will, there are still are mechanisms” that it could use, such as public-private partnerships, tax-incentive financing and other “innovative tools.”
“. . . Nearly every city that made real progress in the last 10 years has done it using innovative finance in as much as using transfer payments from higher tiers of government,” Mr. Clark said.
According to Clark, the world’s leading cities are strong in these four areas:
Clark says that Toronto scores reasonably well in those areas and offers these specific advantages:
The article concludes with a “Ranking world cities” chart, which is based on work by the Globalization and World Cities Study Group, a research network that “focuses upon the external relations of world cities” centred at Britain’s Loughborough University.
The chart measures status as a “command point in the world economy” by assessing the comparative level of services in these areas, which researchers believe are key features of world-class cities.
I’ve taken the chart and formatted it for the web, linking each city name to its corresponding Wikipedia entry. If you’re looking for data on ranking world cities for comparison’s sake or are just hoping to kill a lot of time on the web today, this chart is for you!
| Alpha Cities | First tier | |
| Second tier | ||
| Beta Cities | First tier | |
| Second tier | ||
| Third tier | ||
| Gamma Cities | First tier | |
| Second tier | ||
| Third tier |
A little side-note: the article was written by Globe and Mail staffer Jeff Gray, a friend of mine from Crazy Go Nuts University. We were section editors at the main school newspaper, the Queen’s Journal together, where he was the News editor and I edited a section called Misc, which ran on the back page and was a humour/”lifestyle” section.
There’s a good chance you’ve seen this photo by now: Pictured seated from left to…
Here’s a collection of interesting memes, pictures, an cartoons floating around the internet that I…
Tap to see the source. This is yesterday’s daily New Yorker cartoon, created by Brendan…
C’mon, let it not be Asians this time. Last time was pretty bad. Here’s the…
Jon Stewart’s right, and we’ve been here before. Where we are now, I’ve been before…
View Comments
Pure dreaming -- will never happen in this city under the current administration.
When you talk about P3 (public-private partnerships) projects, people in this city think about:
- Highway 407
- Pearson airport redevelopment
- Health care (Toronto Hospital, William H. Osler P3 projects, etc)
- Small-town water purification projects
In other words, all stuff associated with evil conservative mojo. Of course, your effort doesn't fall into one of these land-mine areas, but I am highly skeptical of this particular city council's desire to get involved in more P3 initiatives.