Categories
In the News

More Liberal Copyright Shenanigans

[via Michael Geist] The Conservatives have an ad titled Even Liberals (it’s on their site) that features a clip of (Liberal Party leader and Prime Minister) Paul Martin at a town hall meeting televised on the CBC. In the clip — barely a couple of seconds long — Martin makes the embarassing admission that he approved an “attack ad” that even some members of the Liberal party didn’t like.

The Liberals claim that in using the clip, the Conservatives are infringing on the CBC’s copyright. I agree with Michael Geist — I think that the Conservatives can easily argue that use of the clip is fair use since it’s short, is being used in a critique and is news reporting (for more on what fair use is, see this entry). This is just another example of copyright being misused as a stick — this time to beat legitimate political speech into silence rather than beat cash out of customers.

Categories
In the News It Happened to Me Toronto (a.k.a. Accordion City)

More Questions from the All-Candidates Meeting

Sorry it took so long, but here’s more from the All-Candidates Meeting. If you missed the other installments:


Question 3: The “Psychotropic Drugs” Question

“There’s no right answer to this question,” said the guy who was next in line, “but I’m just as interested in the way you answer it.” The question was about psychotropic medication — there’s a loophole in the law where people can prescribe psychotropic drugs to children. What would you do to fix that loophole?

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party

  • The public health agency should be able to help
  •    

  • Will establish a mental health commission
  •    

  • Will also hold dialogues cross-country

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party   

  • I’m not in favour of commissions
  •    

  • I helped introduce Steven Fletcher, who’s likely to be Minsiter of Health — I’d bring the issue to him

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • That’s crazy!
  •    

  • The Ministry of Health should be able to close this loophole

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • (A lot of indignant mumbling) full disclosure commission
  •    

  • My notes from this point read: “mumble mumble mumble”

Rob Rischinsky, Green Party   

  • I’d establish a commission to reduce the use of psychotropic drugs
  •    

  • We have to recognize that there are alternative treatments

Question 4: Toronto the ATM

Toronto sends a lot of money to Ottawa — in fact, $13 billion more goes out of the city than into it. Would you support the return of one-quarter of that money? It could go to transit, education, social services and the environment

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party   

  • There’s a full GST rebate for municipalities
  •    

  • Money from the gas tax goes to cities
  •    

  • We’ve given Toronto a bonus for the TTC’s ridership, providing $350 million in partnership with the city and provincial governments

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • We need equalization
  •    

  • The Liberals implemented the gas tax because of pressure from the NDP
  •    

  • The NDP is the champion of cities

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • Legalizing marijuana will lead to tax revenues which will provide the city with money

Rob Rishchynski, Greeen Party   

  • We propose a “Green tax shift” — where personal incomes taxes are reduced to 0 while taxes on pollution and waste are increased
  •    

  • We would transfer tax authority to the local level

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party   

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party

  • We’ll meet with Mayor Miller and the local Business Improvement Areas
  •    

  • We understand the issues and will introduce initiatives

Question 5: One from the Kids

At this point, they opened the floor to the local kids who were in attendance. The first one: How would you decrease child poverty in Canada?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • Poverty has many causes:       
             

    • Lack of affordable housing
    •        

    • Low minimum wage
    •        

    • Lack of childcare
    •        

  •    

  • We also need program to assist new Canadians to give them assistance in settling in; credentials

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • mumble mumble social assistance mumble mumble revenues from legal marijuana mumble mumble

Rob Rishchynski, Greeen Party

  • There are ways to solve child poverty:       
             

    • Pay people a living wage
    •        

    • Provide benefits and child tax credits for people with children
    •        

    • Provide daycare
    •       

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party

  • We’ve done a lot — there’s the Liberal child tax benefit that put money directly in the hands of families
  •    

  • I agree with Peggy Nash — combating poverty requires a holistic approach

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party   

  • It’s telling that a young person asked this question — young people are always most concerned about the future
  •    

  • Canada has vast resources, skills and technology
  •    

  • We can provide for everyone — it’s just that the allocation of wealth isn’t even
  •    

  • We have to stop paying the rich
  •   

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party

  • Poverty is reflective of the lack of posterity
  •    

  • Prosperity leads to generosity
  •    

  • We would fight poverty with       
             

    • Education
    •        

    • Small business opportunities
    •        

    • Apprenticeship programs
    •        

       

Question 6: Another from the Kids

How is the government going to invest in our future?

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party 

  • Education is the key to prosperity
  •    

  • Access Canada
  •    

  • 50/50 program provides up to $3000 of tuition
  •    

  • We need money for measures to help students graduate

Rob Rishchynski, Greeen Party   

  • We will work with the provinces to decrease tuition
  •    

  • Paying off debts can cripple someone just out of school — loan paybacks should be scaled to match the income from a first job
  •    

  • We believe that there should be apprenticeship programs and a mentorship network to help people just out of school build the skills they need

Lorne Gershuny   

  • The aim of government should be to eliminate tuition fees
  •    

  • Anyone with the motivation and ability should be able to get an education

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party   

  • We need to encourage people to get into skilled trades
  •    

  • More programs for apprentices
  •    

  • More small business incentives

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party   

  • We need to reverse cuts to post-secondary education
  •    

  • Need to provide stable long-term funding
  •    

  • Need to establish a program of life-long learning
  •    

  • Need to create a national apprenticeship program

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party   

  • Pass
Categories
In the News

Big Content: Ice Harvesters of the 21st Century

I’m going to talk a little bit more about copyright and Big Content this week. By “Big Content”, I am referring to the corporations that produce movies, televisions, records,

books and even web sites. I thought I’d start by

introducing something that “copyfighters” (those who fight for better

copyright laws and against bad business practices that use copyright as a stick to beat more money out of customers) often talk about: business models. You will often hear a copyfighter

refer to how a Big Content company or cartel will often use copyright

as a means of protecting an outdated business model. Before I talk

about Big Content’s outdated business models, let’s look at a business

model that’s already extinct as a result of technological improvements: Big Ice.

I’ll let one of my role models (especially given my line of work), former Apple evangelist Guy Kawaski do the talking for this one. Years ago, he made a high school commencement address titled Hindsight, a “top ten list” of

advice to the graduating class. Item number eight was “Challenge the known and embrace the

unknown”. It went like this:

One of

the biggest mistakes you can make in life is to accept the known and resist the

unknown. You should, in fact, do exactly the opposite: challenge the known and

embrace the unknown.

Let me tell you a short story about ice. In the late

1800s there was a thriving ice industry in the Northeast. Companies would cut

blocks of ice from frozen lakes and ponds and sell them around the world. The

largest single shipment was 200 tons that was shipped to India. 100 tons got

there unmelted, but this was enough to make a profit.

These ice harvesters,

however, were put out of business by companies that invented mechanical ice

makers. It was no longer necessary to cut and ship ice because companies could

make it in any city during any season. These ice makers, however, were put out

of business by refrigerator companies. If it was convenient to make ice at a

manufacturing plant, imagine how much better it was to make ice and create cold

storage in everyone’s home.

You would think that the ice harvesters would

see the advantages of ice making and adopt this technology. However, all they

could think about was the known: better saws, better storage, better

transportation. Then you would think that the ice makers would see the

advantages of refrigerators and adopt this technology. The truth is that the ice

harvesters couldn’t embrace the unknown and jump their curve to the next curve.

Challenge the known and embrace the unknown, or you’ll be like the ice

harvester and ice makers.

Can

you imagine what things would be like today if the ice harvesters

managed to lobby the government into restricting the activities of the

icebox manufacturers and later on, the refrigerator manufacturers?

That’s exactly what Big Content would like to do to the high-tech

industry.

More on this topic later.

Categories
Geek In the News It Happened to Me

Bulte Round-up

Boss Ross Gets in on the “Remixing Sam” Act

I’m not the only one into the commentary-on-Bulte-by-Photoshop game. My boss, Ross, has taken a crack at it and he’s done a pretty nice job:

Ross won’t mind if you copy this graphic and stick it on your own site.

Ross also notes that he took advantage of advance voting and will gladly tell anyone who asks that Sam did not get his vote.


In This Week’s Macleans: Bulte in the Blogs!

Michael Geist has informed me that along with Cory Doctorow, we’ve been quoted in this week’s issue of Macleans. We were all interviewed by Colin Campbell last week, and our comments appear in a sidebar article titled Bulte in the Blogs: A Dust-Up Over Campaigns and Copyright. Here’s a scan of the bit where your ‘umble blogger gets mentioned:

He sent me a scan of the article [825K PDF], which I have enclosed for your viewing. The scan’s a bit smudged, but I’m planning to buy a half-dozen copies for my portfolio and will see if I can get a cleaner scan posted here.


Doctorow’s Guest Editorial at the Star

Speaking of Cory, if you haven’t read his Toronto Star guest editorial piece on Sam Bulte — Trademark Political Shenanigans — do so now!

My favourite bit is where he talks about DRM — “Digital Rights Management” or “Digital Restrictions Management”, depending on if you’re one of Sam’s God-fearing content corporation buddies or one of those no-good “pro-user zealots” whom Sam condemns. He’s come up a great way of explaining the ridiculousness of region-encoded DVDs (which is why your North American DVDs won’t play in other parts of the world and vice versa):

These are the technological restrictions put on the media that you buy,

such as games, CDs and DVDs, that seek to control how you use works

after you buy them. These DRMs indiscriminately restrict the

enjoyment of your lawful property, allowing rights holders to control

your private use of media in ways not considered under copyright law.

For example, Adobe’s eBook technology blocks your ability to copy and

paste a quotation, even where copyright law would allow it, e.g. in the

course of criticism or in academic research.

DRM technology on

DVDs prevents you from watching discs bought overseas in a Canadian DVD

player, despite the fact that copyright doesn’t give creators the right

to control where their creations are viewed after they’ve been sold.

That’s why you don’t need to leave your Canadian editions of your

favourite books at home when you go on holidays in foreign countries.

Categories
In the News

Happy MLK Day!

It’s Martin Luther King Day, a holiday in the United States. To all my American readers  (especially my mother- and father-in-law, who took advantage of the long weekend to visit Wendy and me), Happly MLK Day!

The story goes that Dr. Martin Luther King was going to go with a short, formal, pre-written speech when gospel singer Mahalia Jackson, sitting in the front row, yelled out “Tell them about your dream, Martin! Tell them about the dream!” Some people in the audience joined in, and in response, Dr. King extemporized the famous speech above, which I shall repeat below:


Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity.

But one hundred years later, we must face the tragic fact that the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize an appalling condition.

In a sense we have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men would be guaranteed the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check which has come back marked “insufficient funds.” But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check — a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to open the doors of opportunity to all of God’s children. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment and to underestimate the determination of the Negro. This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.

We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.

And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, “When will you be satisfied?” We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.

Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.

I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.”

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slaveowners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day the state of Alabama, whose governor’s lips are presently dripping with the words of interposition and nullification, will be transformed into a situation where little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls and walk together as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. This is the faith with which I return to the South. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with a new meaning, “My country, ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim’s pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.”

And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!

Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!

Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California!

But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!

Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!

Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

Categories
In the News It Happened to Me Toronto (a.k.a. Accordion City)

All-Candidates Meeting: First Two Questions

Here are my notes from the first two questions asked at Wednesday’s all-candidates meeting. Just in case you missed it, I also have an entry containing my notes on the opening statements.


Question 1: Island Airport

[As a resident of the area] we are in the flight path leading to the Toronto Island airport. We expect that if it goes into the use planned by the Port Authority, we can expect 5 hours of flights and noise…[starts soapboxing]

[Someone in the audience yells “Ask the question!”]

[Taken slightly aback] What are your plans to close the Island airport and shut down the Port Authority?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party:

  • Would prefer that it was a big park
  •    

  • Liberals failed to deal with the issue
  •    

  • Now the Port Authority is suing Toronto

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party:   

  • I’m with the GTA caucus, and we were instrumental in killing the Island bridge [part of the plan for the airport]
  •    

  • The federal government was not involved in this issue
  •    

  • The Port Authority serves a purpose [wag in audience says: “Yeah, patronage!”
  •    

  • Remain to be convince that a Port Authority hand-over would be a good thing

Lorne Gershuny, Marxist-Leninist Party:   

  • We would consult with people in the neighbourhood for their opinions

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party:   

  • Just as Adscam was a “gift” to Quebec, the Port Authority fiasco was a “gift” to Toronto
  •    

  • The bridge got cancelled, yet we have to pay $32 million [that’s what the Port Authority is suing the city for]

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party:   

  • [unintelligible] don’t know issue [unintelligible] but will listen

Rob Rishchynski, Green Party:

  • Alternatives exist: service Pearson [Toronto International Airport] with subway link

Question 2: Proportional Representation

The “first past the post” system of elections here leaves many small groups under-represented or locked out. What are your opinions on proportional representation?

Peggy Nash, New Democratic Party:   

  • The current system skews democracy and emphasizes regionalism
  •    

  • It is antiquated
  •    

  • The NDP favours a “mixed proportional representation” system [as opposed to a completely proportional one] as recommended by the Canadian Bar Association

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party:

  • That’s one of our promises

Lorner, Marxist-Leninist   

  • Proportional representation would make things marginally better
  •    

  • The party system is outdated, from a time when white males dominated
  •    

  • Today we are dominated by parties

Jurij Klufas, Conservative Party

  • Proportional representation: interesting
  •    

  • Concerned that “the process is lengthy”
  •    

  • Conservatives have proposed some intermin solutions:       
                 

    • Independent director of public prosecution
    •            

    • Federal accountability act
    •        

       

Terry Parker, Marijuana Party:   

  • Will have to discuss this one with the party

Rob Rishchynski, Green Party:   

  • We support it
  •    

  • We’re the only party that you can vote for knowing that we’ll do it

Sam Bulte, Liberal Party [rebutting]:

  • It was part of our February 2004 Democratic Reform Action Plan!
  •    

  • We had cross-country roundtables
  •    

  • The provinces are looking into it
  •    

  • There’s academic research into the issue
  •    

  • We’re talking to people about it
  •    

  • Proportional representation [in and of itself] is not always the answer — you need political will
Categories
In the News It Happened to Me Toronto (a.k.a. Accordion City)

A Taste of the All-Candidates Meeting

Earlier this evening, I attended the all-candidates meeting for my

riding, Parkdale-High Park. The photo below was taken about five

minutes before the meeting started and with people still piling in. The

seats were filled soon shortly thereafter, and it became a “standing

room only” event.

I took notes, but it’ll take a little while to transcribe them. I took

some video of the copyright/beholden-to-big-content questions aimed at

Sam Bulte, and wow, did she get testy. She even mentioned Michael Geist

and the Electronic frontier Foundation by name, in that “they’re part

of my personal demonology” tone of voice. I’ll post it as soon as I can.