Categories
Uncategorized

Tee Medlin accused Chloe Condon of stalking him. Then the truth came out, and got WEIRD.

Fakery is all the rage today, what with “fake news”, social media manipulation, and easily-researched lies being peddled as the truth on the institutional level. But it also happens on the individual level, as this strange story will show. This is a long one, but it’s a good one…

How it began

Some time around January 7th, 2019 a “Tee Medlin” posted a photo on Instagram humble-bragging that that a woman at a conference where he was speaking was stalking him:

The “stalker” in the photo — the sole woman in the foreground of the sausage fest — is Chloe Condon, a developer advocate at Microsoft (not all that dissimilar from my old job), and a friend of my friend Andrew Burke.

More importantly, the photo is not Tee’s — it’s one that accompanied an article that Chloe had written two years earlier for NewCo Shift: What It’s Like to Be a Woman at a Tech Conference. Go and read it, especially if you’re a guy in the tech industry.

Chloe’s response on Twitter was reasonable and measured:

The first step on a trail of fakery: pretending to write in a tech journal

Chloe’s tech advocacy game is strong, and as a result, she’s got serious social capital and no small number of followers on Twitter. They started doing some detective work and found some very oddly inconsistent things about Tee Medlin.

For starters, consider this article from the 1Q 2018 edition of ABB Review, a technical journal published by ABB, an electrical/electronics manufacturing company headquartered in Switzerland, Making Sense of Complexity…

…and then take note of this photo posted by Tee Medlin on Instagram and found by John Pettit. He Photoshopped himself into the article as the author:

Click the photo to see Tee Medlin’s fakery at full size.

Tee also claimed to be the article’s author in Facebook, as pointed out in this Tweet:

Possibly fake employment

Oddly enough, on LinkedIn, Tee lists ABB as his current place on employment:

It would be an incredibly ballsy and career-limiting move take credit for one’s coworkers’ work in online forums. However, it’s unlikely that he works at ABB, based on the email address that he gives out as his work one:

Take a look at the domain part of the email address: social.abb, not abb.com or even social.abb.com. Anyone can register an .abb domain, and if you go to social.abb, you’re taken to a page that tells you that social.abb is a branded short domain. It’s a domain that anyone could’ve registered, including Tee Medlin.

A fake speaker gig

Here’s another Instagram photo found by Tim Yocum in which Tee claims to be the next speaker at an event…

…and here’s a disturbingly similar photo, in which it’s a Calvin Klein event that Tee has nothing to do with:

Do some Googling, and see if you can find any conference where Tee is listed as a speaker. I’ll wait…

Here’s a tweet in which he says that he was excited to speak at the UXPA 2018 user experience conference in Puerto Rico…

If you go to the UXPA 2018 conference program, you’ll see that Dr. Lallemand was scheduled to speak. Tee’s name appears nowhere in the schedule.

Tee also claimed to be a speaker at another user experience conference — UXLX 2018, in Lisbon:

If you look closely at the illustration he posted, you’ll see that the name associated with the talk is Kim Goodwin. If you look at the UXLX 2018 program, you’ll see her name. Guess whose name you don’t see!

One last tweet:

The archived list of speakers for AmuseConf 2018 isn’t complete, but come on — do you think he actually spoke there? (I know one of the speakers, Jon Crowley, and can always check with him.)

A gratitude post featuring a fake accident

Here’s a Facebook post in which Tee writes about how an accident turned out to be a lucky break. Supposedly, if it weren’t for the medical check he had after surviving a car wreck, his brain tumor would’ve never been discovered and removed. The post got 327 “likes” and 85 comments:

The photo is eerily similar to a news story on a car wreck posted three years earlier:

Unlike Tee’s photos, the news story photo doesn’t have the Florida palm trees cropped out.

Photo plagiarism

The car accident photo isn’t Tee’s only fake-gratitude post. Here’s another Facebook gem of his:

That photo was yanked from 500px — here’s the original.

Photoshoppery

Sometimes Tee’s more original with his photo fabrications. Consider a couple of Facebook posts found by Twitter user @nicolewashere84 — first, this:

…and then, this:

The posts purport to cover the span of a couple of days, but they feature the same sweater, helmet in the car, box of donuts, and background ground debris. The “differences” that are supposed to suggest that a day or two has passed are the horizontal image-flipping (notice that Tee is suddenly driving a right-hand-drive car and the text “Donuts” on the box is flipped) and an apparently Photoshop-assisted change to the baseball cap.

Tee’s fake beautiful women friends

Tee is clearly of the belief that nothing improves social standing like having beautiful women friends. Consider this post of his:

Here’s a suspiciously similar photo:

Here’s what Tee wrote as the caption for the photo:

Had a great day in Chapel Hill with Rachel. Always been such a dear friend to me. Love her to pieces. Lots of great laughs and very good advise [sic] on dealing with crazy women that still like to play silly game, which we both find immature and unattractive. #canfriendsfallinlove

He really, really loves Rachel. So much that he’s at a loss for words and simply has to repeat them:

In case you were wondering, “Rachel” is actually Julia Engel, founder of the beauty/fashion blog Gal Meets Glam. And I’m will to bet good money that Tee’s never met her, never mind had heart-to-heart conversations with her.

Tee’s fake girlfriend

How about one more “I know beautiful women, please think highly of me” humblebrag post?

These are actually stills from a Shutterstock stock video series:

Tee’s fake celebrity friend

And finally, here’s a shot where Tee claims to have met actor/comedian/writer/producer Seth Rogen at a charity gold tournament:

By now, you’ve probably guessed that this is fake. You’re right — but it’s a spectacular one. You see, he’s posing with a Seth Rogen statue at Hollywood Wax Museum. You can see that the lighting fixture and wallpaper are the same in both photos. The black-and-white treatment in Tee’s photos were meant to cover up any unrealism in the statue:

Here’s another photo of the statue, as submitted by “Brittany T.” to Yelp:

Even Rogen had to respond:

Tee responds

Upon being found out, Tee went into full damage control mode…

…and then into “I’m the REAL victim here!” mode shortly afterward:

Finally, he went into “hide” mode and closed access to his social media accounts.

In the meantime…

Chloe has gone to the police to report the incident. This is a sensible move, considering:

  • The strange, pathological lengths that Tee went to in constructing his public profile,
  • and the (well-deserved) career-limiting damage that this incident will do.

Chloe also reported Tee’s post — the “this woman is stalking me; notify the cops if I go missing” post — to Instagram, and they replied in the “see no evil” manner that I’ve come to expect from Facebook:

I’m beginning to truly understand the sentiment behind #DeleteFacebook.

There are lessons to be learned from this incident:

  1. From Tee: Social capital and connections can’t be faked — at least not in the long run. If you try it, sooner or later, you will be found out.
  2. From Chloe: Real social capital and connections are far more valuable than you think. Because Chloe is a great developer advocate with people and communications skills and considerable reach, she was able to inspire the community to act. The folks at Microsoft Azure’s advocacy program should realize what a powerhouse they’ve got in their midst.
  3. From Chloe’s following: Great things happen when people pull together. The Chloe Army showed us that people may have never even met, but have a common cause, can pull together and solve problems.

I’m putting this final one in big text, because it’s important and may get overlooked:

4. This one’s especially for men: Stop using women as props in your journey to success. A good portion of the lies cataloged in this article were about Tee trying to confer social status onto himself by pretending to be associated with attractive women. He claimed Chloe was stalking him, pretended that blogger Julia Engel was his friend “Rachel” (and hinted at the possibility of something more), and then there’s his Shutterstock girlfriend. To him, these women weren’t people, but mere accoutrements in a quest to validate what are likely a sorry career and a sad life. It’s a habit that a lot of men have and one that they need to break. It’s not manly, it’s childish.

Chloe, you handled this like a champ, and you’re going to come out of this even better. I salute you with a filet mignon on a flaming sword!

Recommended reading

Be sure the read the Twitter thread where it all happened:

Chloe’s written a blog post reflecting on what happened: What it’s like to be a woman on the internet.

Also worth checking out: Mashable’s coverage of the story.

Categories
Uncategorized

What if the “How hard did aging hit you?” challenge is an evil Facebook trick?

This is more of a thought experiment and fun conspiracy theory than actual conjecture, but I still think the idea’s worth mulling over. Remember, in the original version of the challenge, you’re supposed to use existing Facebook profile photos, which are already in Facebook’s system.

If you regularly check Facebook — at least once a day, or if you’re like many people, more often — you’ve probably seen the viral “How hard did aging hit you?” challenge.

It’s the sort of thing that would appeal to people who like to post pictures of themselves: it asks you to post the profile picture you used when you joined Facebook, post a recent photo of yourself, and let the world see how you’ve aged. Some people have responded by adding their own twist: posting a photo of themselves ten years ago, followed by a recent one.

It’s all good fun — but what if there’s another purpose to that fun? What if it’s a way to get all of us to willingly provide more data to Facebook’s facial recognition system?

A screenshot from the app in my tutorial where I show you how to face detection on Android phones. Click the photo to go to the tutorial.

Facial recognition is the ability of software to match the image of a face to a known person. It starts with finding a few dozen key facial measurements, such as the length of the jawline. These days, it’s all too easy for software to get these facial measurements; I’ve even written a tutorial on using the face feature-detection capabilities on Android phones.

Facial recognition uses these facial measurements to create a set of data that acts as a “signature” for that face. It then compares that “signature” to the “signatures” of other faces in its database (pay particular attention to this sentence). The more similar any two or more “signatures” are, the more likely that they represent the same face, and therefore the same person.

Let me repeat the highlighted point from the previous paragraph: facial recognition works by comparing the “signature” of a given face to the “signatures” of other faces in its database. The more photos of different people in that database, the better a facial recognition system will be at recognizing more people.

At the very least, the “How hard did aging hit you?” challenge gets people to post two photos, one of which is a current one. It even incentivizes people to get their friends to do the same.

For someone who wants to improve the capabilities of facial recognition, the challenge has an additional bonus. By getting people to post photos of themselves when they were younger, you’re providing additional data points that show how people’s faces change as they age. This data would be incredibly useful if you wanted to make a system that could predict what you might look like when you’re older…or for better recognizing people’s faces no matter how old or young they are.

A quick break for a conspiracy theory self-check

It’s been pointed out to me that the original “How hard did aging hit you?” challenge required you to use:

  1. Your first Facebook profile photo, and
  2. Your current Facebook profile photo.

By definition, Facebook already has these photos. They don’t need to con you into posting them.

However, as anyone who regularly uses social media knows, these sorts of challenges morph. People naturally want to show themselves in the best light and post their best photos. I’ve seen a number of my Fecbook friends decided to simply skip the requirement of using profile photos (which are already in the system) and started posting other photos of themselves from the past and present (which may be new to the system). People will always put their own spin on technology, and especially personal technology. As cyberpunk author William Gibson put it, “The street finds its own uses for things.”

Now you can say that this is just coincidence, but it’s also something that an experience social media behavioral analyst might have predicted. Hey, the best conspiracy theories have conspirators who always think several moves ahead!

If you really feel like getting paranoid, look at the number of requests for Facebook user data made by various governments over the years. Here are the requests from 2014:

Click the graph to see it at full size, or click here to see the source.

Let’s look at the numbers from 4 years later:

Click the graph to see it at full size, or click here to see the source.

“How hard did aging hit you?” could be an innocent idea that came about naturally and went viral, or it could have been manufactured by Facebook marketing (or government agencies) in order to entice its user base to unknowingly participate in a big data mining operation. The former seems more plausible than the latter, but the latter isn’t “out there” enough to simply dismiss as a conspiracy theory. I’ll leave it up to you to decide if you want to post your “then and now” photos on Facebook.

That being said, here’s me ten years ago, after playing the U.S. and Canadian national anthems at the start of a roller derby match:

Me and “Lunchbox” of the Gore Gore Rollergirls, George Bell Arena, Toronto, May 2009. Photo by Rannie “Photojunkie” Turingan.

…and here’s me a couple of weeks ago, with Anitra, at a hotel in Clearwater Beach:

Me and Anitra of Team Anitra and Joey at the Malwarebytes holiday party, Clearwater Beach, December 2018. Photo by Yours Truly.

Categories
Uncategorized

Sign of the day

Categories
Uncategorized

Hilarity ensues when you dub “Revenge of the Sith” using the terrible English subtitles from a Chinese pirate copy

Here’s what happened to that oft-repeated Star Wars refrain, “I have a bad feeling about this”, in the opening scene:

The original lines for the following are:

Palpatine: He is a Sith lord.

Obi-Wan: Chancellor Palpatine, Sith lords are our specialty.

…and here’s the subbed/dubbed version:

And during the lightsaber fight between Count Dooku and Anakin:

Here’s the first of a set of highlights from the movie…

…and here are more: part 2, part 3, and part 4. I think they all make the prequels a little more bearable.

May Force be you travelling alongside with for great fortune!

Categories
Uncategorized

And on the eighth day, God created “Vangroovy”

You could say the same for Portland.

Categories
Uncategorized

Happy “Hump Day!”

Click the photo to see it at full size.

It’s a gorgeous morning here in Tampa — hope your “Hump Day” is going just as well!

Click the photo to see it at full size.

Click the photo to see it at full size.

Categories
Uncategorized

“He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting”

A lot of what you need to know about the mentality of Trump’s base appears in the final sentence of this New York Times article on the government shutdown’s effects on people who voted for him:

“He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.” That person voted for Trump to not to bring themselves up, but to bring others down — a particularly toxic, violent, and even deadly form of “crabs in a bucket” thinking. The Atlantic was right: The cruelty is the point.

Recommended reading